ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Machine learning and near-infrared fusion-driven quantitative characterization and detection of protein content in maize kernels.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Determination of Soybean Protein Content by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Coupled with Multi-Learner Ensemble Wavelength Selection.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Interpretability Analysis of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Models for Fat and Protein Prediction in Foxtail Millet [Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rapid fat quantification inFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a rapid and non-destructive method for determining protein content in maize using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). To mitigate the effects of surface irregularities and uneven protein distribution in whole kernels on spectral measurements, maize powder was used as the test material to enhance the uniformity and stability of spectral signals. A total of 90 maize powder samples were collected from major production regions across China, and a custom NIRS acquisition system was constructed. To optimize the spectral data, eight preprocessing methods-including Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC), Standard Normal Variate (SNV), First Derivative (1D), Savitzky-Golay smoothing (S-G), and their combinations-were systematically evaluated. Subsequently, traditional machine learning models (Partial Least Squares Regression, PLSR; Support Vector Machine, SVM) and deep learning models (ResNet-18, Transformer) were developed to predict protein content, and their performances were compared. Results indicated that the combined preprocessing strategy of First Derivative and Multiplicative Scatter Correction (1D + MSC) was the most effective. Among the models, PLSR demonstrated the best predictive performance, and traditional chemometric methods showed greater practical utility compared to deep learning models. To further enhance model efficiency, four feature wavelength selection methods-Partial Least Squares Regression Coefficients (PLSRC), Competitive Adaptive Reweighted Sampling (CARS), Successive Projections Algorithm (SPA), and Uninformative Variable Elimination (UVE)-were applied. It was found that the PLSR model combined with the Successive Projections Algorithm (SPA) yielded the optimal performance, achieving a validation set correlation coefficient (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.