Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479631›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2025

[Gastro- Intestinal Complications in ICU Burn Patients].

N Zied, A Mokline, H Fraj, I Jami, B Gasri, M Ben Saad, A A Messadi

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N ZiedUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie.
A MoklineUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie.
H FrajUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie.
I JamiUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie.
B GasriUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie.
M Ben SaadUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie.
A A MessadiUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction in severely burned patients is common and serious. It results in disruption of the mucosal barrier, which is directly implicated in SIRS and enhanced endotoxin absorption and bacterial translocation that leads to MODS and death. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study in an intensive burn care department in Tunisia, over a period of 6 years, in order to evaluate the incidence of GI complications in burn patients and their impact on burn prognosis. A total of 54 patients were included. The mean age of our patients was 40 ± 22.5 years, with a sex-ratio of 1.25/1. In our series, 2 patients had a history of peptic ulcer and only one was on long-term corticosteroids. TBSA was 36.8 ± 16.1% and ABSI was 6.4 ± 2.8. Antiulcer prophylaxis was prescribed in patients with a history of ulcer (n=2). Systemic analgesia during dressing changes was prescribed in 88.9% of cases. The incidence of GI complications was 2.4%. The median delay of occurrence of these complications was 11.5 days. Revealing symptoms were: melena (n=12), hematemesis (n=11), and abdominal distension (n=11). Digestive hemorrhage was the most frequent (59.3%), followed by abdominal compartment syndrome (16.7%) and isolated peptic ulcer (11.1%). Treatment was medical in 87% of cases and surgery was required in 13% of cases. Mortality in our series was 66.7%.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal dysfunctiongastrointestinal hemorrhageprognosissevere burn

Identifiers

PMID41479631
PMCPMC12755342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.