ArticleRevista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)2025
[Anthropometric identification of excess adiposity in Argentine adults according to the new concepts of obesity].
Article in Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To calculate the prevalence of elevated anthropometric component according to new concepts of obesity in a probabilistic sample of Argentine adult population. Method: Results of the Argentine 4th Encuesta Nacional de Factores de Riesgo were used. Subjects aged 18 to 65 years who had their weight, height and waist circumference directly measured were included (n=12,871 participants of both sexes). Prevalence of elevated anthropometric component was calculated according to traditional criteria (BMI>30), European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) criteria and international committee of experts (ICE) criteria for the diagnosis of obesity. Results: Prevalences obtained in both sexes were 31.8% with the traditional criterion, between 48.7 and 59.3% according to EASO criterion, and between 32.7 and 33.7% according to the ICE. Differences between men and women were significant. Conclusions: Given the difference in results between the new anthropometric criteria proposed for the diagnosis of obesity, it will be necessary to work on identifying which of them best represents excess adiposity in Argentine adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.