ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Evaluation of the protective efficacy of a recombinant adenovirus-vectored SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate for veterinary use.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2019, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has posed a global health threat. Its high transmissibility and cross-species infectivity have disrupted public health systems and worldwide economies, with companion and agricultural animals, like cats and minks, showing high susceptibility. This study evaluated rAd5-S6P, a recombinant vaccine using an adenovirus type 5 vector expressing a modified SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, in murine, feline, and mink models. Results demonstrated that rAd5-S6P elicited a robust humoral immune response when administered via intramuscular, intranasal, and oral routes, which conferred complete protection in mice. In feline and mink models, immunization with rAd-S6P resulted in significantly reduced viral shedding after high-dose SARS-CoV-2 challenge, and no infectious virus was detected in any of the examined organs of minks. Collectively, rAd5-S6P exhibited protective efficacy across species, supporting its translational potential as a veterinary vaccine. These findings provide critical evidence for animal vaccination strategies to control SARS-CoV-2 circulation and reduce zoonotic transmission risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.