ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) inoculants enhance the bacterial network connectivity more than non-PGPB in heavy metal-contaminated soil.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XSZ-1 as a bio-inoculant for enhancing cotton productivity and health in saline-alkali cotton field soil.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Pseudomonas sp. UW4 promotes garlic growth through systemic integration of auxin and ethylene pathways.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizing the performance of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) inoculants in phytoremediation requires a deeper understanding of their interactions with the indigenous soil microbiome. However, current knowledge is particularly limited regarding how PGPB versus non-PGPB inoculants interact with indigenous microbes and establish colonization persistence in the rhizosphere. In this study, we employed amplicon sequencing to compare the impacts of PGPB versus non-PGPB inoculants on the indigenous rhizosphere and bulk soil microbiome of Indian mustard in heavy metal-contaminated soil, and their interactions within the indigenous bacterial networks. Our results showed that both PGPB and non-PGPB inoculants significantly altered the composition and diversity of the rhizosphere microbiome. However, only PGPB inoculants enhanced the complexity and stability of bacterial co-occurrence networks. PGPB inoculants not only maintained rhizosphere persistence but also actively integrated into the network, enhancing associations with indigenous bacterial taxa. Notably, they established enhanced co-occurrence associations with native bacterial taxa characterized as potential PGPB, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.