Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479449›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Gene-R1: Reasoning with Data-Augmented Lightweight LLMs for Gene Set Analysis.

Zhizheng Wang, Yifan Yang, Qiao Jin, Zhiyong Lu

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhizheng WangDivision of Intramural Research (DIR), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Yifan YangDivision of Intramural Research (DIR), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Qiao JinDivision of Intramural Research (DIR), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.
Zhiyong LuDivision of Intramural Research (DIR), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20894, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gene set analysis (GSA) is a foundational approach for uncovering the molecular functions associated with a group of genes. Recently, LLM-powered methods have emerged to annotate gene sets with biological functions together with coherent explanatory insights. However, existing studies primarily focus on proprietary models, which have been shown to outperform their open-source counterparts despite concerns over cost and data privacy. Furthermore, no research has investigated the application of advanced reasoning strategies to the GSA task. To address this gap, we introduce

Indexed as

Data AugmentationFine-tuningGene Set AnalysisLLMReasoning

Identifiers

PMID41479449
PMCPMC12754708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.