ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Producer knowledge and application of mineral supplementation in sheep farming systems.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Minerals are critical for ruminant health, reproduction, and productivity, yet deficiencies in grazing systems are common worldwide. This study characterized mineral supplementation practices among Pennsylvania sheep producers and evaluated their knowledge, perceptions, and diagnostic approaches. Methods: An anonymous Qualtrics survey, conducted from March to August 2024, yielded 168 valid responses from sheep producers statewide. Results: Most respondents managed small flocks (<20 ewes) and rated minerals as "very important" for both health (77.8%) and reproduction (78%). The majority (91.0%) provided supplemental minerals to their animals at certain or all stages of production. Commercial mineral mixes (72.0%) and salt/mineral blocks (29.8%) were the most frequently used delivery methods, with decisions primarily guided by producer experience, extension recommendations, and peer advice. Interestingly, only 30.7% of respondents had tested their soil/forage and only 9.0% had tested animals for mineral deficiencies, despite recognizing the importance of minerals for health and productivity. Reported health concerns included diarrhea, teeth grinding, and milk fever, while key reproductive challenges were mastitis, weak lambs, and stillbirths. Cost constraints, perceived adequacy of pasture, and flock size were cited as reasons for not supplementing. Discussion: These findings highlight strong awareness of mineral importance but limited adoption of diagnostic testing, suggesting potential gaps in targeted supplementation that may be more economical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.