ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Small understory trees increase growth following sustained drought in the Amazon.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amazonian understory forests change phosphorus acquisition strategies under elevated CONature communications · 2026Article
- Amazonian trees under long-term drought exposure are more resilient to El Niño extreme.Communications earth & environment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Droughts pose a major threat to the Amazon rainforest, yet the mechanisms enabling trees to maintain growth under prolonged drought remain poorly understood, particularly in the understory layer. We leveraged a 22-yr Throughfall Exclusion (TFE) in a 1-ha plot in eastern Amazonia, paired with a Control plot, to test whether small understory trees (1-10 cm diameter) grow faster under long-term drought due to acquisitive resource-use strategies and competition release, given that the TFE plot experienced large-tree mortality and canopy gap formation over time. Despite a 51% reduction in density, small trees grew 2.2 times faster in the TFE than in the Control. At the species scale, growth rates increased with acquisitive traits, such as high foliar nutrient concentrations, greater hydraulic conductivity, and higher leaf-to-wood area ratio, but only in the TFE. These shifts towards acquisitive resource-use strategies were observed within species, indicating plastic responses to drought. At the community scale, growth rates were negatively associated with neighbour density in the TFE, suggesting that competition release facilitates growth under drought. Our findings reveal that plastic and competitive processes stabilise the growth of surviving small understory trees after drought-induced self-thinning, highlighting key mechanisms that can enhance forest resilience to future climate extremes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.