ReviewExperientia supplementum (2012)2026
Noncoding RNA in Clinical Trials: Diagnostic and Therapeutical Prospects.
Review in Experientia supplementum (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical potential of noncoding RNA has proven to have major advancements recently. Understanding their mechanisms and biological functions drives the use of ncRNAs in clinical applications. ncRNAs play crucial roles in regulating all cellular processes by influencing key proteins involved in the singling pathways, both at gene transcriptional and translational levels. Additionally, ncRNAs can be detected intracellularly and extracellularly in different body fluids such as blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, facilitating their noninvasive use in clinical settings. Several clinical trials have investigated ncRNAs' therapeutic and diagnostic use, leading to models that mimic the mechanistic functions of dysregulated ncRNAs. These models have provided new clinical tools for early disease diagnosis and therapy. While the FDA has approved some ncRNA-based diagnostic/therapeutic applications, other clinical trials were withdrawn or terminated. Challenges associated with ncRNAs include off-target effects due to a lack of specificity, decreased stability of specific ncRNAs in vivo, low cellular uptake, and limitations in delivery systems. Additionally, most exciting studies focus primarily on some types of ncRNA, such as microRNAs, highlighting the need for broader research into investigating other types of ncRNAs. Unlocking the full potential of ncRNAs will pave the way for a myriad of possibilities for developing novel strategies for early diagnosis, disease prognosis, and targeted therapies for different human diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41479120What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.