Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41479030›Full record

ReviewResults and problems in cell differentiation2026

Chronic Liver Allograft Rejection: Histopathological Insights and Future Directions.

Samar Seeman, Joshua Wong, Adib Edilbi, Ashton A Connor, John M Vierling, Mary R Schwartz, Sadhna Dhingra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Results and problems in cell differentiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samar SeemanDepartment of Surgery, JC Walter Jr. Transplant Center Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Joshua WongDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Adib EdilbiDepartment of Surgery, JC Walter Jr. Transplant Center Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Ashton A ConnorDepartment of Surgery, JC Walter Jr. Transplant Center Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
John M VierlingMargaret M. and Albert B. Alkek Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Mary R SchwartzDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Sadhna DhingraDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. sdhingra@houstonmethodist.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic liver allograft rejection (CR) remains a significant cause of late graft dysfunction and failure despite advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression. This chapter reviews the current understanding of CR, integrating diagnostic histopathological findings, atypical histological patterns of late rejection that are frequently associated with CR, and emerging diagnostic tools. CR is driven by overlapping T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated mechanisms, leading to progressive bile duct loss, vascular injury, and structural alterations. Diagnostic histopathological criteria include interlobular bile duct atrophy or loss, foam cell obliterative arteriopathy, and portal/periportal, perisinusoidal, and perivenular fibrosis. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) and mixed phenotypes exhibit additional vascular and sinusoidal injury, often with subtle biochemical changes. Structural sequelae such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia and variable parenchymal fibrosis underscore the heterogeneity of late graft injury. This chapter also examines late-onset rejection phenotypes, i.e., plasma cell-rich rejection, idiopathic post-transplant hepatitis, and isolated central perivenulitis and their potential to progress to chronic rejection. Future directions emphasize the integration of molecular diagnostics, digital pathology, and noninvasive biomarkers, such as donor-specific antibodies, liver stiffness measurement, and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), to complement or replace protocol biopsies, to guide personalized immunosuppression, and to enable earlier intervention. Advances in regenerative medicine and antifibrotic therapies have the potential to alter the natural history of CR, shifting toward precision medicine approaches that may extend long-term graft survival after liver transplantation.

Indexed as

AllograftsGraft RejectionLiverLiver TransplantationChronic DiseaseHumansC4d immunostainChronic antibody-mediated rejectionChronic rejectionDuctopeniaFoam cell arteriopathyIdiopathic post-transplant hepatitisIsolated central perivenulitisLiver allograftPlasma cell-rich rejectionTCMR

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.