Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41478935›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Measurement of MPO, NAG, and EPO as an Indirect Quantification of Leukocyte Infiltration in Mouse Tissues.

Carla Daiane Ferreira de Sousa, Bruno Silva Amaral, Clara Soares de Souza, Danielle G Souza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carla Daiane Ferreira de SousaLaboratório de Interação Microrganismo-Hospedeiro, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3685-3422
Bruno Silva AmaralLaboratório de Interação Microrganismo-Hospedeiro, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil.
Clara Soares de SouzaLaboratório de Interação Microrganismo-Hospedeiro, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4182-5746
Danielle G SouzaLaboratório de Interação Microrganismo-Hospedeiro, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil. dani@icb.ufmg.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7478-5934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme assays are used to measure the activity or concentration of enzymes in biochemical or cell-based systems. Most enzyme assays are based on the detection of fluorescent, luminescent, or spectrophotometric endpoint signals. In recent years, they have been developed and widely used for diagnostics, mechanisms of action, and inflammatory activities. An enzyme assay essentially works by the conversion of a substrate into a product by the enzyme of interest. In this case, it is extremely important to know the optimal conditions for enzyme activity, as these affect the specificity and efficacy of the assay. For optimal reaction conditions, temperature, pH, and the presence of ions should be considered. In this chapter, the enzymatic assays for the detection of the enzymes N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) are addressed. These assays are used to assess inflammatory parameters, for example, at the peripheral level in models of viral disease. They are based on an index of neutrophil, macrophage, or eosinophil accumulation in inflammatory tissues from animals by measuring the specific activity of the marker enzymes. The enzyme activity assays discussed here are based on colorimetric reactions compatible with any experimental model in which the respective cells has an active role. The advantage of using these enzymatic assays in inflammation response models is that they are simpler and less expensive compared to techniques such as Western blot or quantitative PCR.

Indexed as

AcetylglucosaminidaseEnzyme AssaysEosinophil PeroxidaseLeukocytesPeroxidaseAnimalsColorimetryInflammationMiceAcetylglucosaminidaseEosinophil PeroxidasePeroxidaseEnzyme assayEosinophil PeroxidaseInflammationLeukocyteMyeloperoxidaseN-acetylglucosaminidase

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.