Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41478928›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Handling and Experimentation with Germ-Free Mice.

Camila Bernardo de Brito, Bárbara Maria de Amorim-Santos, Danielle G Souza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camila Bernardo de BritoLaboratório de Interação Microrganismo-Hospedeiro, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Bárbara Maria de Amorim-SantosLaboratório de Interação Microrganismo-Hospedeiro, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Danielle G SouzaLaboratório de Interação Microrganismo-Hospedeiro, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. dani@icb.ufmg.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immediately after birth, mammals are largely colonized by microorganisms, with the gastrointestinal tract being the most commonly colonized organ. Over the years, several studies have shown that the intestinal microbiota is important for various physiological functions of the host. Gnotobiotic animal models are frequently used to better understand how the microbiota influences health and disease scenarios. Among gnotobiotic models, germ-free (GF) animals were first used in 1895, but it was not until 60 years later that germ-free colonies were suitable for large-scale experiments. The use of GF mice is an interesting and rich tool for studying the microbiome. However, their maintenance is a complex process that needs to be done carefully. In this chapter, we describe step by step how to manage and manipulate the gut microbiota of GF mice.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGerm-Free LifeAnimalsMiceConventionalizationGerm-free miceGnotobiotic miceMicrobiotaMonocolonization

Identifiers

PMID41478928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.