Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41478886›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2026

The cardiac conduction system: development, function and therapeutic targets.

David S Park, Glenn I Fishman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David S ParkLeon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Glenn I FishmanLeon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. glenn.fishman@nyulangone.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2366-8527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cardiac conduction system (CCS) has a vital role in initiating and coordinating nearly 3 billion heartbeats throughout a person's lifetime. The CCS comprises two primary tissue types: the impulse-generating, slow-conducting nodes and the fast-conducting components of the ventricular conduction system. Dysfunction in this system can give rise to a spectrum of clinical symptoms, including palpitations, syncope, heart failure and even sudden cardiac death. Owing to the limited therapeutic options other than electronic pacemakers, substantial research efforts have been aimed at uncovering the root causes of conduction system disorders. A comprehensive investigative approach integrating genetics, transcriptomics and proteomics has been used to unravel the complex biology of these diseases. Advances in single-cell genomic and transcriptomic technologies, together with spatial transcriptomics, are offering new insights into the cellular microenvironments that govern conduction system function. In this Review, we examine the latest progress in understanding the biology of the CCS, situating new findings within both established and emerging scientific paradigms. Additionally, we discuss how these insights can be leveraged to improve clinical risk assessment, expand drug discovery efforts, accelerate technology aimed at promoting CCS regeneration and foster the development of innovative therapies, including biological pacemakers.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart Conduction SystemAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.