ArticlePsychiatry investigation2026
The Role and Effectiveness of Remote Mental Health Interventions in Disaster Response: A Narrative Review.
Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDisasters such as pandemics and natural catastrophes cause significant psychological distress, increasing the risk of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of remote mental health interventions, such as telepsychiatry, online cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mobile applications, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools, during disasters.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using international databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL) and Korean domestic databases (KISS, RISS, DBpia, KMbase, KoreaMed). Studies published between January 2010 and February 2025 were screened following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Two board-certified psychiatrists independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full texts. Peer-reviewed articles and relevant grey literature, including government manuals and expert guidelines, were included.
resultsA total of 147 studies were synthesized, including randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, observational studies, and policy documents. Evidence showed that remote interventions effectively reduced symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Online CBT was beneficial for mild to moderate distress; mobile apps facilitated psychoeducation and symptom tracking; and telepsychiatry ensured care continuity, especially in underserved areas. AI tools showed promise in screening and triage but require better clinical integration. Effectiveness was highest when interventions were implemented early, integrated within stepped-care models, and guided by trained professionals.
conclusionRemote mental health interventions are practical and effective tools for bridging mental health care gaps during disasters. To ensure sustainability, these interventions should be integrated into national disaster mental health frameworks, accompanied by adequate funding, clinician training, legal safeguards, and cultural adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.