Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41478570›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2026

A revised model of nuclear actin import: Importin 9 competes with cofilin, profilin, and RanGTP for actin binding.

Amanda J Keplinger, Prithi A Srinivasan, Sarah M Christensen, Cristian Suarez, Alexander J Ruthenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda J KeplingerDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Prithi A SrinivasanDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sarah M ChristensenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Cristian SuarezDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Alexander J RuthenburgDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Electronic address: aruthenburg@uchicago.edu.

Funding

Defining the mechanisms of epigenetic information flowR35GM145373 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Alexander Jackson Ruthenburg · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While predominantly studied in cytoplasmic contexts, actin plays critical roles in the nucleus, regulating genome accessibility, transcription, and DNA repair. Cell-based studies have contributed to a widely accepted model in which the import factor importin 9 (IPO9) acts in concert with the actin filament-severing protein cofilin to transport actin into the nucleus. The classical nuclear localization signal on cofilin is thought to anchor IPO9 to cofilin-bound actin monomers, driving the formation of an import-competent tripartite actin-cofilin-IPO9 complex. Contrary to this established model of actin import, we demonstrate that IPO9 directly binds to monomeric actin with midnanomolar affinity and, rather than promoting IPO9-actin complex formation, cofilin competitively inhibits the binding of IPO9 to actin. To define the mechanism of IPO9 binding, we subject monomeric actin to competitive IPO9 binding in the presence of well-established actin-binding molecules and find proteins that engage either the barbed face, profilin, or pointed face, DNase I, competitively limit IPO9-actin complex formation, whereas sterically less demanding binding partners, thymosin beta-4 and latrunculin B, do not. Consistent with these findings, we demonstrate that IPO9 modestly decreases the rate of actin filament assembly, a process that requires both actin faces, and that IPO9 exhibits minimal binding to actin filaments. Finally, we identify unexpected affinity between the nuclear import release factor RanGTP and monomeric actin; however, a tripartite IPO9-actin-RanGTP complex does not form. The competitive interactions observed between IPO9 and cytoplasmic actin-binding proteins suggest that dynamically coupled equilibria mediate the nuclear transport of actin monomers.

Indexed as

Actin Depolymerizing FactorsActinsbeta KaryopherinsCell NucleusKaryopherinsModels, BiologicalProfilinsran GTP-Binding ProteinActive Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsHumansProtein BindingActin Depolymerizing FactorsActinsbeta KaryopherinsKaryopherinsProfilinsran GTP-Binding ProteinactincofilinG-actinkineticsnuclear translocationnuclear transportprotein importprotein–protein interactionsurface plasmon resonancethermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID41478570
PMCPMC12860355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.