ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Impact of episiotomy on anal incontinence following second- to fourth-degree perineal tears-A cohort study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnal incontinence can have a significant negative impact on quality of life. The leading cause of anal incontinence among women of child-bearing age is obstetric-related perineal injury. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of episiotomy on the incidence of anal incontinence among primiparous women with second-, third-, or fourth-degree perineal tears at 8 weeks and 1 year postpartum and to assess change in incidence over time across varying degrees of perineal tears. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis Swedish cohort study included 12 658 primiparous women who sustained a second- (n = 5309), third- (n = 6771), or fourth-degree tear (n = 578), either spontaneously or in association with an episiotomy, between 2014 and 2019. Data were collected from national health and quality registers. The primary outcomes assessed were fecal and gas incontinence at 1 year postpartum. Secondary outcomes included lifestyle alteration and Wexner score. Logistic regression analyses were performed, and results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using spontaneous tear as the reference group. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, prepregnancy diabetes, gestational age, mode of delivery, length of the second stage, fetal presentation, birth weight, and head circumference.
resultsThe incidence of gas incontinence 1 year after second-, third-, or fourth-degree tears was 11.0%, 23.6%, and 37.8%, respectively. The incidence of fecal incontinence was 1.8%, 5.2%, and 14.5% for loose stool, and 0.8%, 2.1%, and 6.6% for solid stool, respectively. Women with a second-degree tear and episiotomy had an adjusted OR of 1.26 (95% CI 1.02-1.55) for gas incontinence and 1.38 (95% CI 0.90-2.10) for fecal incontinence at 1 year postpartum. Episiotomy did not increase the risk of anal incontinence among women with third-degree and fourth-degree tears. Anal incontinence, lifestyle changes, and Wexner score decreased over time across all types of tears.
conclusionsAnal incontinence increases with the severity of perineal tears; however, the risk of incontinence is primarily determined by the grade of injury rather than the presence or absence of an episiotomy. Symptoms decline over time across all degrees of tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.