Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477741›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

A Concept Analysis of the Dynamics of Risk, Midwifery Agency and the Maternity Early Warning Tool.

Bridget Ferguson, Amanda Henderson, Clare Harvey, Adele Baldwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bridget FergusonCQUniversity School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-3609
Amanda HendersonCQUniversity School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0564-3243
Clare HarveyFaculty of Health and Social Development, School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-8840
Adele BaldwinCQUniversity School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Townsville City, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6325-4142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine the concept of midwifery agency when using Maternity Early Warning Tools.

designConcept analysis using Rogers' evolutionary method.

methodsData were collected from interviews with midwives working in various Australian maternity settings. A subset of the dataset was collected and analysed (2021-2022) to examine how agency functions when midwives use Maternity Early Warning Tools.

resultsThree conceptual attributes fundamental to agency were identified: considered judgement, reasoned clinical decision-making, and collaborative action. These attributes reveal how midwives navigate the interface between structured risk management tools and relational, woman-centred care.

conclusionsMaternity Early Warning Tools can either limit or enhance professional agency. When used reflexively, they become artefacts that support learning, communication, and sound clinical judgement. Viewing these tools as enablers rather than enforcers sustains midwifery expertise and strengthens interdisciplinary collaboration. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT: Sustaining midwifery agency protects both professional integrity and the quality of woman-centred care. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? How the use of Maternity Early Warning Tools influences midwives' agency.

Indexed as

MidwiferyNurse MidwivesProfessional AutonomyRisk ManagementAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyadvocacyagencyautonomyclinical decision makingmidwifeprofessional judgement

Identifiers

PMID41477741
PMCPMC13460955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.