ArticleJournal of nursing management2025
Spirituality, Culture and Job Satisfaction in the Holistic Assessment of Nurses' Well-Being at Work: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye Tracking-Based Evaluation of Auditory Spatial Attention in a Virtual Auditory Environment: Protocol for Development of a New Approach and Preliminary Validation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Exploring Nursing Students' Experiences of the COVID-19 Period at a Public Nursing College in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Spirituality, Culture and Job Satisfaction in the Holistic Assessment of Nurses' Well-Being at Work: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nurses' well-being at work has become a global concern due to persistent stressors such as staff shortages, shift work, emotional demands and limited autonomy. Most existing studies take a deficit-centred perspective, focussing on burnout or work stress and ignoring the complexity of holistic well-being. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess nurses' levels of well-being at work across six well-being domains and explore its relationship with job satisfaction, health status and functional limitations. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 767 nurses working in various healthcare institutions in Slovenia. The six-dimensional well-being scale for nurses, which was translated and psychometrically validated for this study, was used to assess physical, emotional, intellectual, social, occupational and spiritual well-being. Results: The overall median score for nurses' well-being at work was 2.97 (on a scale of 1-5), slightly below the neutral midpoint ( Conclusions: Nurses' well-being at work has many facets and is influenced by personal health, job satisfaction and professional context. A holistic model can highlight strengths and weaknesses that are often overlooked in traditional, burnout-centred approaches. Implications for Nursing Management: Nurse managers should incorporate well-being into HR policy through relationship-centred leadership, flexible working practises and values-led support. Interventions should include reflective spaces, mentoring and learning opportunities tailored to emotional, intellectual and spiritual development. Monitoring dimensions of well-being as a key performance measure can lead to sustainable improvements in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.