ArticleJournal of nursing management2025
Identifying and Evaluating Predictors of Well-Being Among Nurses Working in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying and Evaluating Predictors of Well-Being Among Nurses Working in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nurses face numerous challenges in clinical settings that can negatively affect their well-being. Little is known about bedside nurses' well-being in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study explored the well-being of nurses working in Saudi Arabia and identified the contributing factors. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that utilized convenience sampling. Data were collected from 550 nurses working in the Saudi healthcare sector. The Nurse Well-Being Index was utilized to measure the well-being. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and logistic regression. Results: The findings showed that 74.2% of nurses were at an increased risk of poor well-being, with frontline nurses facing a further increased risk of poor well-being (83%). Results showed significant associations between nurses' well-being and level of education ( Discussion: This study revealed that most nurses were at an increased risk of poor well-being. It also provided insights into various individual, organizational, and job-related factors that contribute to well-being. Future studies are needed to identify different aspects of nurses' well-being to develop strategies for improving their well-being and reduce burnout and other detrimental health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.