ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
How do UK-based university students understand family support in relation to the impact it may have on their wellbeing?
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A person's wellbeing is influenced by many factors at various stages of life, and research has found that family support is hugely important in its maintenance. During adolescence, (as a result of many biological and cognitive changes which take place during this stage), many young people might experience decreased wellbeing. Such difficulties are further exacerbated in university students, with research showing that this age group are prone to experiencing high rates of mental health difficulties. Various quantitative studies have investigated student mental health, yet there has been little focus on the subjective experiences of wellbeing and social support. The current study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of how university students perceive family support and the impact this might have on their wellbeing. Methods: Due to the nature of the study, an advert was placed for all Psychology undergraduate students at a university in the North-West of England. A total of 16 semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes were identified: "type of support," "family context" and "balance and adjustment." Discussion: The findings highlighted that university students view family support as vital in maintaining positive wellbeing, and that parental support was valued the most among various types of family support. This included both emotional and financial support. Unlike the wider literature, in the current study, some students considered financial support to be less necessary while others suggested that wellbeing may be negatively impacted by inadequate monetary support. Furthermore, family background such as culture and socio-economic background was seen to greatly influence the support provided. Lastly, students emphasized that family support can be beneficial when a balance is stricken, and support is neither overbearing nor lacking. Students highlighted how divorce or absent parents can negatively impact students' wellbeing. Similarly, helicopter parenting or parents who sought to control and put pressure were perceived as overbearing. Offering the right support that met the needs of students at the right time was classed as adequate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.