ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
An investigation of the relation between online and offline violence: methodological and theoretical considerations.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Research focusing on whether exposure to "online" violence via social media (exposure to violent content, such as videos of beatings or fights) predicts the use of physical "offline" violence (from hitting and threatening someone to violence against objects) in real-life is scarce and consists of mostly qualitative studies. The current quantitative study was designed to investigate this association while controlling for gender, and used the General Aggression Model (GAM) and the Developmental Neuro-ecological Risk-taking Model (DNERM) for its theoretical framework. Additionally, to what extent developmental stage (adolescents vs. young adults) and (offline) peer deviancy moderate this association was explored. We further used two separate measures of exposure to violent social media: (1) violent social media exposure in general and (2) violent social media exposure by friends. Methods: A total of 292 ethnically- and socio-economically-diverse Dutch youth between 16 and 24 years (M = 19.52; SD = 3.218) participated in a survey study. Results: Consistent with our theoretical frameworks, stepwise regression analyses supported the main hypothesis, as a significant association was found between the two measures of exposure to violent social media content and youth violence in real-life. However, we only found partial support for the moderation hypotheses: while peer deviancy was not a significant moderator, it was a significant predictor. Additionally, developmental stage was a significant predictor, and it was a significant moderator-but only when the "violent social media exposure in general" measure was used. Specifically, in support of DNERM, the results revealed that the link between violent social media exposure in general was stronger for adolescents (versus emerging adults). Discussion: The current results demonstrate for the first time that when it comes to the effect of violent social media exposure on real-life violence, it may matter who (friends versus non-friends) is posting the violent content, but it also matters who the audience [e.g., adolescents versus (emerging) adults] is, and whether peer deviancy is already taken into account. Experimental and longitudinal research on this topic are necessary to further establish these findings. Methodological and theoretical considerations when investigating such online influences are discussed to guide future research on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.