ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Paranoia affected COVID-19 vaccine refusal by increasing beliefs in conspiracy theories and mistrust of science.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Psychological determinants of COVID-19 vaccination have been widely studied since the onset of the pandemic, yet little is known about how these factors evolved once vaccines became available. This study addresses this gap by examining psychological predictors of vaccination attitudes and behavior during Italy's third wave (spring 2021), a phase marked by widespread vaccine access and persistent public uncertainty. Methods: A total of 375 adults completed standardized measures of anxiety, depression, death anxiety, paranoia, mistrust in science, mistrust in scientific communication, and conspiracy beliefs. Vaccine intentions were assessed through perceived usefulness and safety, and by actual uptake. Using structural equation modeling with Huber-White robust estimation and bias-corrected bootstrapping, we tested a mediation model linking psychological factors to vaccine evaluation and behavior. Results: The analysis revealed that paranoia exerted a significant indirect effect on both vaccine evaluation and uptake, mediated by mistrust in science and conspiracy beliefs. Death anxiety displayed a small but direct positive association with vaccination behavior. Discussion: These findings suggest that while contextual factors such as vaccine availability shape overall attitudes, paranoia and related distrust remain stable psychological barriers to vaccine acceptance. The present study extends prior research by clarifying how enduring cognitive biases interact with situational context to influence vaccination decisions, with implications for public health communication strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.