ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Efficacy Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided and Dual-Guided (Ultrasound Plus Nerve Stimulation) Subcostal Quadratus Lumborum Block in Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block in Relieving Postoperative Pain After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of ultrasound (US) guidance alone versus combined nerve stimulation (NS) and US in subcostal quadratus lumborum block (SQLB) for patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. Methods: Eighty-four patients scheduled for laparoscopic nephrectomy were randomized to receive a SQLB with either US alone (US group) or combined US and NS guidance (US-NS group). Each patient received 25 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine for the block. The primary endpoint was the block success rate within 5 minutes after block. Secondary endpoints included the extent of sensory block, intravenous morphine equivalent consumption, NRS scores, frequency of rescue analgesia administration, puncture time, number of needle insertion attempts, ultrasonic images quality, and incidence of adverse reactions and complications. Results: The US-NS group demonstrated significantly higher block success rate compared to the US group (92.5% vs 62.5%, P < 0.05). Additionally, the US-NS group exhibited lower opioid requirements and fewer rescue analgesia interventions within the initial 24-hour postoperative period, broader sensory block coverage at 5, 10, and 15 minutes following injection, and lower NRS scores both at rest and during coughing at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-surgery. However, the US-NS group required a longer puncture duration and more attempts to complete the SQLB. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the quality of ultrasound images and the incidence of adverse effects. Conclusion: Dual guidance with NS and US was superior to US alone for performing SQLB, resulting in higher block success rates and improved analgesic efficacy for laparoscopic nephrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.