Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477576›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telemedicine and applications2025

Exploring the Normalisation of Telepsychiatry Practice Among Private Psychiatrists in Australia: A Convergent Mixed Methods Study.

Luke Sy-Cherng Woon, Paul A Maguire, Jeffrey C L Looi, Rebecca E Reay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luke Sy-Cherng WoonAcademic Unit of Psychiatry & Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8216-0694
Paul A MaguireAcademic Unit of Psychiatry & Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-9918
Jeffrey C L LooiAcademic Unit of Psychiatry & Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3351-6911
Rebecca E ReayAcademic Unit of Psychiatry & Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9497-5842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The widespread use of telepsychiatry requires a better understanding of its integration into routine practice. Using the normalisation process theory (NPT), we aimed to measure and explore Australian psychiatrists' normalisation of telepsychiatry into private practice. Methods: This convergent parallel-mixed methods study consists of an online survey of private psychiatrists using the Normalisation Measures Development (NoMAD) instrument and semistructured in-depth interviews of private psychiatrists. We measured normalisation levels by the NPT constructs. We used logistic regression analyses to examine individual (psychiatrist) and practice factors for higher telepsychiatry patient load. We also thematically analysed the interviews according to the NPT. Finally, we integrated the quantitative and qualitative findings and drew inferences on factors for greater telepsychiatry integration. Results: We surveyed 110 respondents. Higher cognitive participation and collective action were associated with greater telepsychiatry use (> 50% patient load). The high-load group was less likely to view telepsychiatry as different from usual work practice. Solo practices, and practices covering nonmetropolitan areas, were associated with a higher telepsychiatry load. Thirteen interviews were conducted. Telepsychiatry was largely regarded as equivalent, accessible, flexible and efficient. A conducive environment (resources, policy frameworks and general acceptance) promoted adoption. Telepsychiatry's adverse effects on work quality and well-being and its limitations and potential misuse were noted. In implementing telepsychiatry, perceived similarity to conventional consultations, bottom-up initiatives tailored to individual needs, confidence and skills and personal appreciation of its benefits were important. Conclusions: Telepsychiatry is a useful tool that can be successfully integrated into routine private practice with adequate support.

Indexed as

implementation scienceprivate practicepsychiatryqualitative researchtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID41477576
PMCPMC12752830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.