ArticleImmuno-oncology technology2025
Phase II trial on nivolumab plus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma: PORTER-M3 trial.
Article in Immuno-oncology technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Mucosal Melanoma Therapies: Current Status and Future Directions.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The response rate of nivolumab monotherapy for mucosal melanoma is only ∼20%. The objective of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with radiotherapy for metastatic mucosal melanoma. Patients and methods: The eligibility criteria were: histological diagnosis of metastatic mucosal melanoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and presence of measurable lesions. Patients received nivolumab with concurrent radiotherapy for measurable lesions, for a total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions per week. The primary endpoint was the response rate of all lesions (overall response rate, ORR). The study was considered to have met its primary endpoint if at least 6 of the 17 patients had a response (ORR ≥35.3%). The secondary endpoints were the disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled, and 17 were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 41.2%, with two patients showing complete response, five partial response, and four stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survival were 4.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2-15.1 months] and 20.1 months (95% CI 7.5-31.5 months), respectively. Immune-related adverse events of grades 3 or 4 occurred in 35.2% (6/17) of the patients. The radiation-related adverse events were grade 3 radiation dermatitis in one patient and grade 3 radiation pneumonitis in one patient. Conclusions: Concurrent radioimmunotherapy consisting of nivolumab and radiotherapy showed promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic mucosal melanoma, warranting further evaluation in large studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.