ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2025
Development and Validation of the Climate Change Anxiety Scale-Short Form.
Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: this study aimed to provide preliminary validity evidence for an 8-item short form of the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS-SF) in a sample of Italian emerging adults. Specifically, it tested the factor structure, measurement invariance across sex, and construct validity of the CCAS-SF. Method: the study involved 891 Italian emerging adults (32.40% male; Mage = 23.00, SD = 2.50; age range: 19-29 years). The researchers conducted a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to evaluate the factor structure of the CCAS-SF. Measurement invariance across sex was tested through configural, metric, and scalar invariance. Internal consistency of the subscales was assessed, and correlations with anxiety and depression symptoms were examined to assess construct validity. Results: the CFA supported a two-factor structure for the CCAS-SF, cognitive-emotional and functional impairment. Measurement invariance was confirmed across sex (configural, metric, and scalar invariance). The internal consistency of both subscales was good. Analysis revealed that females had higher levels of cognitive-emotional impairment compared to males, but there were no significant sex differences in functional impairment. Both subscales showed positive correlations with anxiety and depression symptoms. Conclusions: the Italian CCAS-SF is a brief, valid, and reliable tool for assessing climate change anxiety. It is particularly useful for time-constrained research and as a resource for mental health professionals working with emerging adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.