ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in CNS Infections: A Diagnostic Pathway and Resource Utilization Modeling Study.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human Pegivirus Encephalitis With Brain Detection and Response to Sofosbuvir Ledipasvir.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing meningitis and encephalitis remains challenging due to nonspecific clinical presentations and the limitations of traditional microbiological methods. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) offers a broad approach to detect pathogens, but its real-world impact on clinical decision-making remains undefined. Methods: We used a cohort of patients with confirmed central nervous system infections and autoimmune encephalitis (AE) who underwent traditional microbiological cerebrospinal fluid testing at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Using published sensitivity and specificity data for mNGS, we applied Bayes' theorem to calculate different etiology-specific pretest probabilities and model the potential impact in the diagnostic workflows including the number of lumbar punctures (LPs), additional etiologic tests potentially avoided, and time to diagnosis. Results: The cohort includes 54 patients in the infectious cohort and 29 patients with confirmed autoimmune encephalitis. In a modeled scenario, utilizing an mNGS test, such as Delve Detect, in patients with DNA viral infections (n = 23) could lead to a reduction of up to 88 microbiological tests, 145 days to diagnosis, and 2 LPs in total. For bacterial infections (n = 16), estimated impact included a reduction of 30 microbiological tests, 144 days to diagnosis, and 12 LPs (Table 1). Although fungal, RNA viral and parasitic infections were less common, with adjusted positive predictive values of 92.8%, 89.5%, and 84.6%, respectively. In the autoimmune cohort, a total of 2 LPs, 126 microbiological tests, and 297 days to diagnosis could have been avoided through the use of mNGS. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that an mNGS test, such as Delve Detect, could potentially streamline diagnostic and treatment pathways in meningitis and encephalitis of infectious or autoimmune origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.