ArticleBiophysics reports2025
Multiscale analysis of mechanical stress in muscle under static and dynamic loading.
Article in Biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep tissue injury (DTI) is a serious condition primarily triggered by prolonged mechanical loading rather than short-term excessive force. Cyclic force stimulation has been shown to enhance cellular protection; however, the biomechanical mechanisms underlying tissue and cellular responses to such stimulation remain poorly understood. This study investigates the biomechanical effects of cyclic force transmission from viscoelastic muscle tissue to muscle fibers using a multiscale finite element model with varying cyclic force parameters. Finite element analysis was used to examine the impact of different frequencies and amplitudes of force stimulation, considering the viscoelastic properties of tissues and cells. Results indicated that, on each one of the three model scales, the average maximal Von Mises stress during stress relaxation increased with cyclic force amplitude at a constant frequency. At a fixed amplitude, frequency variations did not influence the average maximal Von Mises stress in the macroscopic and mesoscopic models. However, in the microscopic model, higher frequencies resulted in lower average maximal Von Mises stress at low amplitudes and higher average maximal Von Mises stress at high amplitudes. Notably, a high-frequency, low-amplitude cyclic force mode reduced the average maximal minimum principal stress by 3.6% in the first four seconds and 5.8% in the last 16 seconds of the 20-second stress relaxation period. These findings suggested that such a cyclic force mode may mitigate or delay mechanical damage caused by prolonged mechanical loading, offering insights into potential strategies for preventing DTI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.