Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477398›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case of Unilateral Spatial Neglect and Impaired Dorsal Attention Network Function Due to Acute Subcortical Hemorrhage: Focusing on Endogenous Attention While Walking.

Atsushi Iwasa, Takato Nishida, Hideki Nakano

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atsushi IwasaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Ookuma Hospital, Nagoya, JPN.
Takato NishidaFaculty of Rehabilitation and Care, Seijoh University, Tokai, JPN.
Hideki NakanoGraduate School of Health Sciences, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unilateral spatial neglect is a higher-level cognitive disorder characterized by difficulty perceiving or responding to stimuli in the contralateral space due to lesions in the cerebral hemisphere. Presently, there are clinical challenges in the assessment of and intervention for unilateral spatial neglect. First, assessments and interventions are often conducted under static conditions, such as sitting, which can lead to discrepancies in the symptoms observed during daily activities, such as walking. Second, although unilateral spatial neglect affects both the peripersonal and extrapersonal space domains, conventional interventions have mainly targeted the peripersonal space domain, with insufficient attention to the extrapersonal space domain. In this case report, we aimed to present a case in which we evaluated walking conditions, using a treadmill, and an endogenous attention task targeting the extrapersonal space domain, using a laser pointer, in a 50-year-old male with a hemorrhage in the right superior parietal lobe. The evaluation revealed discrepancies between seated and walking conditions. Following the intervention, the participant's attention span toward the left side improved during walking, and walking ability increased after 5 days. The intervention continued, and the participant was discharged 1 month after the onset of cerebral hemorrhage. This suggests that evaluations and interventions targeting extrapersonal spaces under dynamic conditions that are more closely aligned with daily life may be effective for symptom improvement, addressing issues that cannot be fully captured by desk-based tests alone.

Indexed as

dorsal attention networkstrokeunilateral spatial neglectvisuospatial attention networkwalking

Identifiers

PMID41477398
PMCPMC12748006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.