ArticleCureus2025
Tripartite Inca Bone in Skeletal Remains.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Inca bone, also known as the interparietal bone, is an anatomical variant resulting from incomplete fusion of the occipital bone during embryological development. Although its presence has been reported with varying frequencies among specific ethnic groups, its relevance in forensic anthropology remains underexplored. This report describes a human skull discovered along a riverbank, exhibiting advanced postmortem changes, including complete loss of soft tissue and dentition, as well as cranial bone destruction. Morphological analysis suggested the individual was a male over 40 years of age. Notably, a tripartite Inca bone was identified beneath the lambdoid suture. Due to its low prevalence and morphological variability, the Inca bone may serve as a useful marker in forensic identification and ancestry estimation. Accurate recognition of this variant is also important in cases of cranial trauma, where it must be differentiated from fractures. While the absence of antemortem data precluded positive identification in this case, radiological comparison with antemortem cranial imaging may facilitate identification in similar future cases. The identification of an Inca bone in forensic skeletal remains can provide meaningful anthropological and forensic insights. Forensic practitioners should remain aware of this anatomical variant during skeletal examinations to improve the accuracy of both trauma analysis and personal identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.