ArticleMachine learning. Health2025
Incorporating physicians' contouring style into auto-segmentation of clinical target volume for post-operative prostate cancer radiotherapy using a language encoder.
Article in Machine learning. Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer requires precise contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) to account for microscopic disease that is invisible in the image. However, the absence of the prostate gland and unclear anatomical landmarks make this process challenging. In addition, the contouring style is greatly influenced by the physician's experience and preferences. This complicates automatic segmentation algorithms that rely on consistent data but also typically need large amounts data from many physicians to develop. This study presents a novel auto-segmentation method incorporating individual physicians' contouring styles to enhance accuracy and reduce manual workload. Methods: We develop Text-UNet, a deep learning-based model integrating a text encoder to encode physician-specific contouring styles into a latent vector. This information is combined with CT image features to guide segmentation. A dataset of 824 patients is divided into 699 training, 49 validation, and 76 testing data. The test set includes recent cases from four physicians, while the training set represents data from seven physicians. Results: Text-UNet achieves an average Dice score of 85.1%, outperforming the baseline UNet (82.0%) and state-of-the-art models. Incorporating physician-specific information improves segmentation consistency and reduces manual contouring effort, demonstrating its potential to enhance the auto-segmentation of post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Conclusion: By integrating physicians' contouring styles, Text-UNet addresses inter-physician variability, improving CTV auto-segmentation precision. This approach personalizes radiotherapy planning according to physicians and improves treatment efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.