ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2025
Recent advances in engineering nano/microrobots for tumor treatment.
Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic nanorobots in oncology: From targeted drug delivery to smart theranostic systems.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Performance Estimation and Ex Vivo Validation of Untethered Magnetic Robots in Soft Tissue.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Miniaturization in robotic surgery: a bibliometric and science mapping analysis of technological evolution and clinical translation (1996-2026).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- What Does Bacteria Have to Do with Cancer? The Influence of the Body's Microbiota on Cancer in Cats and Dogs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until now, although nanomedicines have gained much success in tumor treatment by reducing severe toxic side effects of drugs and improving the therapeutic efficiency of drugs, they are still faced with thorny challenges in targeted drug delivery including insufficient targeting accuracy, poor penetration into tumor core, and systemic toxicity issues. Recently, engineering nano/microrobots with multiple remarkable properties such as real-time sensing, interacting and manipulating capabilities, and programmability, have received increasing attention in biomedical applications ranging from disease diagnosis, targeted drug delivery, medical imaging, and surgery. More importantly, in different driven modes, nano/microrobots are capable of performing a wide variety of powerful functions, such as enhancing tissue penetration and payload retention in deep-seated tumors with active navigation, being programmable to release drugs or performing specific tasks directly at the tumor site with high precision and accuracy, automating repeated tumor treatment without the need for frequent interventions, and minimizing out-of-target tissue damage, leading to a huge exploration potential in tumor treatment. In this review, we delve into the recent progress and the development direction of nano/microrobots for tumor treatment and emphasize the working mechanisms and the unique functionalities of different driven modes in detail. Meanwhile, we elaborate on the application of nano/microrobots fabricated from various types of materials in tumor therapy. Finally, the key factors to be considered in the clinical translation of the above nano/microrobots are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.