Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477345›Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2025

Graph neural networks driven acceleration in drug discovery.

Rui Wang, Chunlin Zhuang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rui WangThe Center for Basic Research and Innovation of Medicine and Pharmacy (MOE), School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Chunlin ZhuangThe Center for Basic Research and Innovation of Medicine and Pharmacy (MOE), School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are revolutionizing drug design processes. Over the past five years, GNNs have emerged as transformative tools by accurately modeling molecular structures and interactions with binding targets. Breakthroughs in predicting molecular properties, drug repurposing, toxicity assessment, and interaction analysis, along with generative GNNs enhancing virtual screening and novel molecule design, have significantly sped up drug discovery. These GNN-driven innovations improve predictive accuracy, cut development costs, and reduce late-stage failures. This review focuses on the interdisciplinary integration of GNNs throughout the discovery process, including lead discovery and optimization, synthetic route design, drug-target interaction prediction, and molecular property profiling, while critically evaluating the challenges in translational medicine.

Indexed as

De novo drug designDrug–target interactionGraph neural networksLead discoveryLead optimizationProperty predictionSynthetic routeVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID41477345
PMCPMC12750157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.