Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477314›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Supermarket nutritionists' perspectives, views, and experiences on affordability interventions to support healthier and more environmentally sustainable food purchasing in UK retail settings.

Rebecca A Stone, Adrian Brown, Flora Douglas, Hannah Greatwood, Claire Griffiths, Emma Hunter, Alexandra Mary Johnstone, Marta Lonnie, Michelle Morris, Hannah Skeggs and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rebecca A StoneDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Adrian BrownCentre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Flora DouglasSchool of Health, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Hannah GreatwoodObesity Institute, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Claire GriffithsObesity Institute, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Emma HunterSchool of Health, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Alexandra Mary JohnstoneThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Marta LonnieThe Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Michelle MorrisSchool of Food Science and Nutrition & Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Hannah SkeggsIGD, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Charlotte A HardmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Food insecurity (lack of reliable access to affordable and nutritious food) is a major concern in high-income countries because it increases the risk of poor nutrition, obesity and associated adverse health outcomes. Healthier diets are often also more environmentally sustainable (hereafter; sustainable), an important factor in reducing climate change. Practice-based interventions are therefore urgently needed to support people living with food insecurity and obesity to access and afford healthier and sustainable foods. Supermarkets are a key area for intervention, as purchasing can be an antecedent to consumption. However, the retailers' perspectives on the feasibility of implementing affordability interventions is often overlooked and under-researched. Therefore, this study explored the perspectives, views, and experiences of major UK supermarket senior nutritionists on the acceptability and feasibility of using affordability interventions for healthier and sustainable food in the supermarket. Methods: We recruited seven UK senior supermarket nutritionists who represented 85% of the UK grocery market share. We used semi-structured interviews and analysed the data using a reflective thematic analysis approach. Results: Supermarket nutritionists perceived that their business did prioritise health and environmental sustainability for customers. However, there were several challenges encountered when trying to promote healthier and more sustainable food in the supermarket environment, including profitability concerns, unpredictability of intervention outcomes, control over own-brand products, perceived intention-behaviour gap, and a belief that they are already implementing affordability interventions. Differences in how supermarkets approach the evaluation of interventions also emerged, as well as a willingness to collaborate with academics and other retailers to optimise the evaluation of interventions. Lastly, supermarket nutritionists raised the need for an operationalised definition for sustainable food products. Discussion: Affordability interventions to support customers to purchase healthier and more sustainable food require supermarkets to consider multiple challenges. Findings highlight the need for upstream intervention that mandates and facilitates multi-lever approaches to health and sustainability without compromising commercial viability, along with practice-based approaches to implementation and evaluation.

Indexed as

affordabilitycommercialfood insecurityhealthy dietobesityqualitativesupermarketsustainability

Identifiers

PMID41477314
PMCPMC12750461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.