ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
TeaWeeding-Action: a vision-based dataset for weeding behavior recognition in tea plantations.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying systemic risks and mitigation strategies of artificial intelligence in agriculture: from social-technical-ecological systems framework.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- From classical practices to precision agriculture: a multidisciplinary review of tea (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a novel publicly available computer vision dataset specifically designed for weeding behavior analysis in tea plantations. Targeting the pressing challenges posed by weed infestations and aligning with global food security strategies, the dataset aims to advance intelligent weeding behavior recognition systems. The collection comprises 108 high-definition video sequences and 6,473 annotated images, capturing a wide range of weeding activities in real tea plantation environments. Data acquisition followed a hybrid approach combining field recordings with web-crawled resources, and encompasses six categories of weeding behaviors: manual weeding, tool-assisted weeding, machine-based weeding, tool-specific actions (including hoe and rake), handheld weeding machine use, and non-working states. A key innovation of the dataset lies in its multi-view acquisition strategy, integrating frontal, lateral, and top-down perspectives to ensure robust three-dimensional understanding of weeding behaviors. Annotations are provided in both COCO and YOLO formats, ensuring compatibility with mainstream object detection frameworks. Benchmark evaluations conducted with advanced algorithms such as YOLOv8, SSD, and Faster R-CNN demonstrate the effectiveness of the dataset, with Faster R-CNN achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 82.24%. The proposed dataset establishes a valuable foundation for the development of intelligent weeding robots, precision agriculture monitoring systems, and computer vision applications in complex agricultural environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.