Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477243›Full record

ArticleApplied psycholinguistics2025

Perceptual-semantic features of words differentially shape early vocabulary in American Sign Language and English.

Erin E Campbell, Jennie Pyers, Naomi Caselli, Amy Lieberman, Arielle Borovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psycholinguistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erin E CampbellBoston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8770-2317
Jennie PyersWellesley College, Wellesley, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-2912
Naomi CaselliBoston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-4203
Amy LiebermanBoston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-9216
Arielle BorovskyPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Funding

Lexico-semantic abilities in early language growth and delayR01DC018593 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Arielle Borovsky · 2021 to 2026
$5.8M
Development of Gaze Control for Integration of Language and Visual Information in Deaf ChildrenR01DC015272 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Amy M Lieberman · 2016 to 2026
$4.4M
Effects of input quality on ASL vocabulary acquisition in deaf childrenR01DC018279 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CASELLI, NAOMI K. · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
Touch to learn: How sensory cues impact word segmentation and learningR21HD108730 · NICHD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI BOROVSKY, ARIELLE, SEIDL, AMANDA H · 2023 to 2024
$521k
American Sign Language Vocabulary AcquisitionR21DC016104 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CASELLI, NAOMI K. · 2017 to 2019
$504k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD108730NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015272NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018279NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018593NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do sensory experiences shape the words we learn first? Most studies of language have focused on hearing children learning spoken languages, making it challenging to know how sound and language modality might contribute to language learning. This study investigates how perceptual and semantic features influence early vocabulary acquisition in deaf children learning American Sign Language and hearing children learning spoken English. Using vocabulary data from parent-report inventories, we analyzed 214 nouns common to both languages to compare the types of meanings associated with earlier Age of Acquisition. Results revealed that while children in both groups were earlier to acquire words that were more strongly related to the senses, the specific types of sensory meaning varied by language modality. Hearing children learned words with sound-related features earlier than other words, while deaf children learned words with visual and touch-related features earlier. This suggests that the easiest words to learn are words with meanings that children can experience first-hand, which varies based on children's own sensory access and experience. Studying the diverse ways children acquire language, in this case deaf children, is key to developing language learning theories that reflect all learners.

Indexed as

Deaflanguage developmentsemantic featuressign languagevocabulary

Identifiers

PMID41477243
PMCPMC12753005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.