ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Using virtual reality to understand gun owner decision-making.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nearly 70% of gun owners support requiring concealed carry license applicants to pass a test demonstrating safe and lawful weapon use. However, many states are removing training requirements and gun owners' behaviors and decision-making are under-examined. We sought to assess whether virtual reality (VR) could provide insight into these elements in the context of public carrying. Methods: We created a novel VR system with a practice-focused firing range and two public-space scenarios involving (1) alleged shoplifting and (2) armed robbery. Participants completed scenarios in random order, then participated in a semi-structured debriefing interview which explored actions and decisions within the scenarios, impressions of system mechanics, and perceived realism. Interviews were audio recorded, professionally transcribed, and inductively coded to identify themes. Results: Ten gun owners completed the study. In both scenarios, participants reported wanting to avoid weapon use to prevent escalating tensions. In the robbery scenario, intentions to intervene were notably dependent on perceived risk of physical harm to self or others. Although participants described some mechanical distractions related to holster non-visibility and an underweighted mock handgun, all stated their behaviors represented real-life behavioral intentions. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first immersive VR system to test gun owners' behaviors and decision-making in public carrying situations. Participants' gun use was influenced by non-player characters' actions and the presence of another gun. These findings suggest VR may create meaningful and low-risk environments for teaching or evaluating safe public carrying if firing range or other training access is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.