ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Nature's cryptographic codebreaker
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic underscored the urgent need for broad-spectrum antiviral agents capable of targeting both viral proteins and host factors to mitigate disease severity. Apigenin has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. However, the potential of apigenin against SARS-CoV-2 remains insufficiently explored. Methods: In this study, the potential role of apigenin in the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the underlying mechanism were explored using matrix factorization, deep learning, multiscale molecular modeling and network pharmacology. Results: The graph-based integrated Gaussian kernel similarity (GiGs) model predicted that apigenin might be a drug against SARS-CoV-2. The prediction of drug-target affinity using a convolution model with self-attention (CSatDTA) model revealed the potential binding affinity of apigenin with glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG). Molecular docking further validated strong binding to GRP78 (-8.198 kcal/mol) and moderate binding to HSPG (-5.6 kcal/mol), mediated by van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds. Multiscale molecular modeling revealed that apigenin could bind to Non-structural protein 15 (Nsp15). Further, the network pharmacology analysis implied that apigenin might modulate the host inflammatory responses by potentially regulating the PI3K-Akt and HIF-1 signaling pathways and binding directly to protein kinase B (AKT1) and prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2). Discussion: Computational profiling suggests apigenin exerts a multi-target mechanism against SARS-CoV-2, potentially disrupting viral entry, replication, and host inflammatory responses. The findings of this research outline a promising strategy and provide a rationale for developing novel natural product-based treatment methods for SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.