ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2025
A Novel Multidimensional Fidelity Framework for Cardiac Surgery Simulation: A Thematic Literature Review.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Simulation-based training is increasingly being adopted in cardiac surgery to train future surgeons. Although low- and high-fidelity cardiac surgical simulations have been described previously, simulation fidelity or the degree to which a simulation replicates reality is poorly defined and not well established. This study examines the literature on the themes of fidelity using a novel multidimensional surgical framework. Methods: A keyword-based literature review was conducted to retrieve published cardiac surgical simulation studies using MEDLINE and EMBASE, from January 2000 to February 2020. The search was limited to the date of publication and not by type. Within predefined dimensions, the included articles were thematically analyzed using a hybrid coding approach to identify fidelity themes and subthemes. Results: Twenty-six articles were included in the thematic analysis after duplicate removal, screening, and eligibility assessment based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven themes were identified within physical, surgical, and interactional dimensions. They were derived from environmental, equipment, anatomical, physiological, procedural, perceptual, and psychological simulation components. Subthemes for three levels of realism were generated for each theme by using an iterative process. Conclusion: This fidelity framework provides educators with actionable guidance for designing cost-effective cardiac surgical simulation for competency-based training by enabling selective fidelity utilization. Educators can apply this framework through aligning learning objectives, fidelity dimensions and levels accordingly. The framework facilitates optimal resource allocation by designing effective and fit for learner simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.