Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477130›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2025

How Well Will AI Help Recognize Voice Disorders? A State-of-the-art Review of Current Acoustic Assessment Strategies and Future Applications.

Meike Brockmann-Bauser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Meike Brockmann-BauserDivision of Speech Pathology University of Education Weingarten Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2548-7383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the current clinical application and usefulness, shortcomings and future directions of traditional and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven acoustic assessment techniques to detect voice dysfunction. Data Sources: Literature review. Conclusion: AI-based acoustic voice analysis techniques have huge potential to improve the early recognition, diagnosis, and tracking of treatment success in patients with voice disorders or diseases affecting voice function. Through smartphones, wearable devices, and server-based solutions, acoustic voice assessment techniques have become widely available and may be extended to workplace and private settings. However, the transformative potential is thwarted by several limitations including a lack of (a) consistent data collection and reporting standards, leading to heterogeneity of current databases and literature; (b) characterization what acoustic analysis techniques including AI can detect or track reliably, and whether the derived outcomes serve as a reliable marker of dysfunction, pathology, or an improvement thereof; (c) clinical validation studies in unselected patients; and (d) ethical and legal controversies. Thus, substantial effort to research, define and establish guidelines for the collection, storage, and processing of acoustic data and valid clinical applications is warranted to design sensible strategies for analysis and use.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI) and voicedysphoniahealth carespeech production and measurementvoice disorders/diagnosisvoice quality

Identifiers

PMID41477130
PMCPMC12753194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.