ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Open-source cell culture automation system with integrated cell counting for passaging microplate cultures.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue culture in 96-well microplates is conventionally a tedious, highly manual process sensitive to individual technique and experimenter error. Here, we describe the Automated Cell Culture Splitter, a system for passaging plates of adherent or suspension cells, for routine culture maintenance or specialized applications such as seeding plates for microscopy. The system is built around the Opentrons OT-2 liquid handling robot and incorporates a novel on-deck imaging-based cell counter which allows it to compensate for density disparities across a source plate and control the number of cells seeded on a per-well basis. We find this solution can cut hands-on time by 61% and the results compare favorably to our existing manual cell culture processes in terms of both seeding density precision and biological outcomes, achieving a control of seeding density with a well-to-well coefficient of variation under 11%. The system is designed to be adaptable and an accessible entry point into automation for high-throughput cell culture; to that end, all of the source code and hardware designs are released under open source licenses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.