ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
Sex differences in the presentation and management of acute coronary syndrome patients: Insights from the FORCE-ACS registry.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study reports sex differences in the clinical presentation, treatment management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in The Netherlands, using data from the FORCE-ACS registry. Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted using data from 5023 patients admitted with ACS between 2015 and 2019, with complete three-year follow-up. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, in-hospital treatment and outcomes were compared by sex. Multivariable regression analyses explored associations between sex and clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 5023 patients, 29 % were women. Women were generally older, with a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (61.7 % vs 54.2 %), chronic kidney disease (25.7 % vs. 18.5 %) and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) (13.5 % vs. 6.5 %). Women less frequently underwent revascularisation, even after excluding those with non-obstructive coronary artery disease, and received less medical treatment compared to their male counterparts. At 36 months, women had higher unadjusted mortality rate (13.7 % vs. 11.0 %, OR 1.28, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.54) and bleeding events (26.2 % vs. 22.3 %, OR 1.24, 95 % CI: 1.08-1.43). However, after adjustment for age and baseline characteristics, these differences were no longer statistically significant. Recurrent ACS and stroke remained similar in both groups, also after correction. Conclusion: Differences between women and men were observed in clinical presentation, interventional treatment, pharmacotherapy and outcomes among ACS patients in The Netherlands. Despite receiving less guideline-recommended care, women had similar adjusted 36-month outcomes as men. These findings show that there is room for improvement in the management of ACS, with a focus on optimized treatment strategies for women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.