Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477107›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026

Sex differences in the presentation and management of acute coronary syndrome patients: Insights from the FORCE-ACS registry.

Shabiga Sivanesan, Aleksandra Gąsecka, Niels M R van der Sangen, Wout W A van den Broek, Jaouad Azzahhafi, Dean R P P Chan Pin Yin, Qiu Ying F van de Pol, Ronald J Walhout, Melvyn Tjon Joe Gin, Ron Pisters and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Shabiga SivanesanDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Aleksandra GąseckaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Niels M R van der SangenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wout W A van den BroekDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Jaouad AzzahhafiDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Dean R P P Chan Pin YinDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Qiu Ying F van de PolDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Ronald J WalhoutDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands.
Melvyn Tjon Joe GinDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Ron PistersDepartment of Cardiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Deborah M NicastiaDepartment of Cardiology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Gerben J de RoestDepartment of Cardiology, Rivierenland Hospital, Tiel, the Netherlands.
Georgios J VlachojannisDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rutger J van BommelDepartment of Cardiology, Tergooi MC, Hilversum, the Netherlands.
Wouter J KikkertDepartment of Cardiology, Tergooi MC, Hilversum, the Netherlands.
José P S HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jurriën M Ten BergDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Yolande AppelmanDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study reports sex differences in the clinical presentation, treatment management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in The Netherlands, using data from the FORCE-ACS registry. Methods: A prospective analysis was conducted using data from 5023 patients admitted with ACS between 2015 and 2019, with complete three-year follow-up. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, in-hospital treatment and outcomes were compared by sex. Multivariable regression analyses explored associations between sex and clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 5023 patients, 29 % were women. Women were generally older, with a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (61.7 % vs 54.2 %), chronic kidney disease (25.7 % vs. 18.5 %) and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) (13.5 % vs. 6.5 %). Women less frequently underwent revascularisation, even after excluding those with non-obstructive coronary artery disease, and received less medical treatment compared to their male counterparts. At 36 months, women had higher unadjusted mortality rate (13.7 % vs. 11.0 %, OR 1.28, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.54) and bleeding events (26.2 % vs. 22.3 %, OR 1.24, 95 % CI: 1.08-1.43). However, after adjustment for age and baseline characteristics, these differences were no longer statistically significant. Recurrent ACS and stroke remained similar in both groups, also after correction. Conclusion: Differences between women and men were observed in clinical presentation, interventional treatment, pharmacotherapy and outcomes among ACS patients in The Netherlands. Despite receiving less guideline-recommended care, women had similar adjusted 36-month outcomes as men. These findings show that there is room for improvement in the management of ACS, with a focus on optimized treatment strategies for women.

Indexed as

Acute coronary syndromeMenRegistrySex differencesWomen

Identifiers

PMID41477107
PMCPMC12752759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.