Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477099›Full record

ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025

Enhancing Outpatient Clinic Recruitment: A Quality Improvement Strategy for a Prospective Research Study.

Priya D Bolikal, Ryan Schuetter, Tess Guzman, Richa Patel, Paul J Gubanich, Shari L Wade, Lynn Babcock, Megan Narad, Sarah M Eickmeyer, Brad G Kurowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Priya D BolikalDivision of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's, Cincinnati, OH.
Ryan SchuetterDivision of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's, Cincinnati, OH.
Tess GuzmanDivision of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's, Cincinnati, OH.
Richa PatelDivision of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's, Cincinnati, OH.
Paul J GubanichDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Shari L WadeDivision of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's, Cincinnati, OH.
Lynn BabcockDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Megan NaradDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Sarah M EickmeyerDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS.
Brad G KurowskiDivision of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's, Cincinnati, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To improve study recruitment by increasing the number of eligible participants who receive study information during their outpatient clinical care. Design: Quality improvement study. Setting: Outpatient clinics from July 2024 to January 2025. Participants: Eligible patients across 16 outpatient clinics (N=231, mean age=14.1 ± 2.0 y, women=46%, White=74%). Interventions: Using quality improvement methodology, the team identified barriers and key drivers for recruitment from clinics. The initial interventions included designating and engaging a clinical staff member in each clinic to distribute study information (recruitment champion), notifying them of potentially eligible patients, tracking progress, and incentivizing recruitment with small rewards. Recruitment was tracked and reviewed monthly to assess progress and identify interventions for ongoing iterations. Main Outcome Measures: Primary: Percentage of eligible patients who received study information during their clinic visit. Secondary: Study enrollment rates. Results: During this period, 58.9% of eligible patients received study information during their clinic visits (baseline rate from prior similar study=32.6%). Enrollment from clinic contact averaged 59% (baseline rate from prior similar study=21.8%). Chi-square test indicated a significantly higher proportion of patients received information about the study from clinic staff compared with the prior similar study (χ Conclusions: This project demonstrates the successful application of quality improvement methodology toward optimizing clinical recruitment. Approaches used in this study can potentially be generalized to other outpatient clinical populations and research studies.

Indexed as

Brain injuryClinical recruitmentConcussionRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41477099
PMCPMC12750426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.