ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Enhancing Outpatient Clinic Recruitment: A Quality Improvement Strategy for a Prospective Research Study.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To improve study recruitment by increasing the number of eligible participants who receive study information during their outpatient clinical care. Design: Quality improvement study. Setting: Outpatient clinics from July 2024 to January 2025. Participants: Eligible patients across 16 outpatient clinics (N=231, mean age=14.1 ± 2.0 y, women=46%, White=74%). Interventions: Using quality improvement methodology, the team identified barriers and key drivers for recruitment from clinics. The initial interventions included designating and engaging a clinical staff member in each clinic to distribute study information (recruitment champion), notifying them of potentially eligible patients, tracking progress, and incentivizing recruitment with small rewards. Recruitment was tracked and reviewed monthly to assess progress and identify interventions for ongoing iterations. Main Outcome Measures: Primary: Percentage of eligible patients who received study information during their clinic visit. Secondary: Study enrollment rates. Results: During this period, 58.9% of eligible patients received study information during their clinic visits (baseline rate from prior similar study=32.6%). Enrollment from clinic contact averaged 59% (baseline rate from prior similar study=21.8%). Chi-square test indicated a significantly higher proportion of patients received information about the study from clinic staff compared with the prior similar study (χ Conclusions: This project demonstrates the successful application of quality improvement methodology toward optimizing clinical recruitment. Approaches used in this study can potentially be generalized to other outpatient clinical populations and research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.