ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025
Changes in Gait After Training for Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia.
Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Smartphone-Based Markerless Motion Capture for Quantitative Gait Assessment in Pediatric Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Two-Case Proof-of-Concept Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate gait changes for individuals who performed either home aerobic or balance training. Design: Single-blind randomized clinical trial. Setting: Home training and outcome assessments at large, tertiary, urban hospital. Participants: Individuals with cerebellar ataxia (N=52). Interventions: Individuals in the aerobic group trained 30 minutes per session, 5 times per week at up to 85% predicted maximum heart rate. Individuals in the balance group (control) performed 30 minutes of balance exercises of varying difficulty 5 times per week. Participants in both groups were expected to train for 1 year. Main Outcome Measures: Gait parameters (step length, step variability, stride width, gait velocity) were determined at 0, 6, and 12 months. Results: Of the 52 individuals who agreed to participate, 24 individuals in each group had gait analysis performed. At 12 months, 20 and 19 participants had gait analysis performed in the balance and aerobic groups, respectively. Linear mixed effect model analysis was used to determine difference between individuals in the balance versus the aerobic group. Step length was the only parameter that showed statistically significant improvement with aerobic training over balance training (6mo: Conclusions: There was a minor improvement of increased step length in individuals with ataxia who performed home aerobic training compared to home balance training. However, individuals with ataxia who regularly performed either type of home training had statistically significant improvements in multiple gait parameters compared to those who did not train regularly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.