Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477072›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025

Age Is Not the Limit-Functional Outcomes and Discharge Predictors in a Neurorehabilitation Cohort of Mixed Ages.

Mauro Silva, Armin Schnider, François Herrmann, Christophe Graf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mauro SilvaDivision of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva.
Armin SchniderDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
François HerrmannDivision of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva.
Christophe GrafDivision of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To identify predictors of functional improvement and home discharge across a wide age spectrum in a real-world inpatient neurorehabilitation cohort, and to assess whether age independently influences rehabilitation outcomes. Design: Retrospective observational cohort study. Setting: Two inpatient neurorehabilitation units within a university hospital: a high-intensity program (Neurorehabilitation Unit A) and a geriatric-adapted, less intensive program (Neurorehabilitation Unit B). Participants: A total of 694 patients (N=694) admitted for neurorehabilitation between January 2018 and April 2020. Mean age was 66.6±17.5 years; 47.1% were women, and 60.1% were admitted poststroke. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Home discharge; functional improvement defined as ΔFIM≥10 and Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score (MRFS)≥0.5. Results: At discharge, 74.9% of patients returned home. Functional improvement was achieved in 32.5% (ΔFIM≥10) and 18.3% (MRFS≥0.5). In multivariable models, age was not independently associated with any outcome. Positive predictors of home discharge included higher FIM score at discharge (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07), lower FIM score at admission, and greater therapy intensity. Functional improvement was associated with longer length of stay and lower comorbidity burden. Use of antipsychotics (home discharge) and antidepressants (MRFS) were negatively associated with outcomes. Hospitalization in the geriatric unit (Neurorehabilitation Unit B) was associated with lower odds of recovery and discharge home, likely reflecting increased frailty and complexity. Conclusions: Chronological age was not an independent predictor of home discharge or functional improvement in this mixed-age cohort; generalization to the oldest-old and markedly frail populations should be cautious. Functional status, comorbidities, and therapy factors were more relevant for prognosis. These findings support individualized, age-inclusive rehabilitation strategies that focus on clinical complexity rather than age alone.

Indexed as

Discharge destinationFunctional recoveryNeurorehabilitationOlder adultsRehabilitationRehabilitation outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41477072
PMCPMC12750419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.