Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477067›Full record

ArticleArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2025

Effective and Efficient Rehabilitation. What Works Best for Persons With SCI During (Sub)Acute Phase of Rehabilitation?

Stefan Metzger, Boris Polanco, Inge Eriks-Hoogland, Armin Gemperli, Diana Pacheco Barzallo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefan MetzgerFaculty of Health Science and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Boris PolancoFaculty of Health Science and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Inge Eriks-HooglandFaculty of Health Science and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Armin GemperliFaculty of Health Science and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Diana Pacheco BarzalloFaculty of Health Science and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the effectiveness and efficiency of comprehensive rehabilitation in improving the score of the spinal cord independence measure III (SCIM) for individuals with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D). Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: A specialized spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation clinic in Switzerland that admits patients from across the country and provides (sub)acute rehabilitation following SCI/D. Participants: This study analyzes the clinical data of 383 patients (N=383) who received rehabilitation from a specialized spinal cord injury hospital and rehabilitation center in Switzerland from 2017 to 2020. Interventions: Not applicable. This study used routinely collected clinical and administrative data from the clinic. Main Outcome Measures: We estimated the average effectiveness by computing how the SCIM changed from admission to discharge during the (sub)acute phase of rehabilitation. To compute the efficiency of rehabilitation, we used 2 measures: 1. length of hospital stay and 2. severity of the services a person received. The results were adjusted by patients' characteristics, using a generalized additive model. Results: Comprehensive (sub)acute rehabilitation for persons with SCI/D is effective, with an average improvement of 35.7 SCIM points. Key factors influencing rehabilitation effectiveness included sex, age, etiology, number of comorbidities, and injury group. Rehabilitation efficiency increases by an average of 0.34 SCIM points per day, or 0.30 SCIM points per Swiss francs (CHF) 1,000. Conclusions: Rehabilitation for persons with SCI/D is shown to be effective. However, there is variability in clinical outcomes and severity across injury groups, emphasizing the need for tailored clinical management strategies. Further research is needed to deepen the understanding of clinical outcome variability and efficiency factors by considering the severity of services.

Indexed as

EffectivenessEfficiencyHealthcare servicesLength of stayRehabilitationSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID41477067
PMCPMC12750421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.