ArticleMedical review (2021)2025
The AI doctor will see you soon: from assistants to autonomous practitioners.
Article in Medical review (2021), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is bringing an unprecedented evolution in human history. As it develops, the utilization of AI in clinical practice becomes one of the hot topics that attracts the attention of the medical field as well as the public. While we know that AI will be heavily involved in the medical system, a critical question is what we expect for the future AI medical doctor. To answer this question, it is important to understand that the developing patterns of any other discovery and industrialization do not fit the pattern of AI development, because it acts more like a human instead of simply being a machine or tool. Thus, AI doctors function like human doctors to provide patient-centered reasoning, intellectual judgment, and ethical decision-making rather than just mechanical data processing. Here we present such a likely development process, including current AI status, expected AI doctors, challenges, and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.