ArticleSafety and health at work2025
Occupational Risk of COPD: Insights from a Large Cohort Study.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A two-sample Mendelian randomization study of the causal relationship between respiratory diseases, gastric cancer risk, and Helicobacter pylori infection.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a critical public health challenge globally. While tobacco smoking is the most recognized risk factor, occupational exposures-especially to vapors, gases, dusts, and fumes (VGDF)-are increasingly acknowledged as substantial contributors. This study offers a secondary reanalysis of publicly available Canadian data, originally collected through the occupational disease surveillance system (ODSS), to investigate COPD risk across diverse occupational sectors and gender strata. By transforming the original hazard ratio data into intuitive visual representations-including scatter plots, histograms, violin plots, and bar charts-we expose previously overlooked gender disparities and risk clusters. Notably, female workers in cleaning, textile, and food preparation services face equally high or even elevated risks compared to men in construction or manufacturing. Our findings underscore methodological limitations in prior studies-such as insufficient detail in indirect smoking adjustment, reliance on outdated occupational coding systems, and lack of individual-level variables-and emphasize the need for gender-sensitive surveillance, policy-oriented communication, and international data-sharing frameworks. This study reframes occupational COPD not only as a biomedical condition but as a social justice issue shaped by labor inequality and surveillance blind spots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.