Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41477049›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2025

Dynamics of COVID-19 Risk Perception in Indonesia: A Consecutive Cross-sectional Study From 2020 to 2022.

Mila Tejamaya, Amelia A Putri, Baiduri Widanarko, I Md Ady Wirawan, Bina Kurniawan, Yahya Thamrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mila TejamayaDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Amelia A PutriDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Baiduri WidanarkoDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
I Md Ady WirawanDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
Bina KurniawanDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Yahya ThamrinDepartment of Occupational Health and Safety, Hasanuddin University, Makassar City, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: According to Schneider et al (2021), the perception on COVID-19 risk needs to be assessed longitudinally to understand its persistence and predictors. This stability of this perception helps in designing communication strategies, especially during a pandemic. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate changes in of Indonesians' risk perceptions toward COVID-19 over a three-year period (2020-2022) and factors associated with the changes. Methods: A standardized, self-directed online questionnaire developed by Effective Communications in Outbreak Management for Europe was used to assess risk perception and its associated variables. Results: A total of 2,708 people participated in the survey, which comprised 1,043 participants in 2020, 890 in 2021, and 775 in 2022. Analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) Conclusion: Therefore, it is essential to develop a tailored communication strategy for different sexes and occupations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Indonesiareligionrisk perceptionrisk tolerance

Identifiers

PMID41477049
PMCPMC12750300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.