ArticleSafety and health at work2025
Predicting the Risk of Burnout Syndrome Using Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS): A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of the use of artificial intelligence as a psychological assessment tool.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Calibrated Deep-Learning Risk Indexing and Latent Behavioural Profiling for Occupational Mental-Health Risk Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Changes in the workplace have increased occupational stress, leading to health issues such as burnout syndrome (BOS), which results from poorly managed chronic workplace stress. The Korean Burnout Syndrome Scale (KBOSS) has been used to diagnose these issues, but its stigma and decreased compliance with application have limited its widespread use. This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict BOS risk from occupational stress factors and identify these influential factors. Methods: Using a dataset of 1,205 individuals across 40 companies, we evaluated the predictive performance of five machine learning algorithms. Each model was optimized via resampling and 5-fold grid search cross-validation and evaluated using an ROC-AUC, balanced accuracy, overall accuracy, and F1 score. SHAP was used to quantify the contribution of each feature to the prediction, identifying key occupational stress factors. Results: All five models demonstrated strong predictive performance, with random forest achieving the most balanced results across the evaluation metrics, including a ROC-AUC of 0.904. SHAP analysis identified "Job instability" and "Lack of reward" as the most substantial BOS risk factors; "Relationship conflict" and "Organizational system" also played important roles. Moreover, the relationship between the SHAP values and feature values revealed critical transition points between "Agree" and "Disagree" responses for each KOSS factor. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that machine learning can effectively predict BOS risk based on occupational stress factors. By enabling the early identification of at-risk employees, this approach improves cost efficiency and offers a scalable solution for BOS risk assessment and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.